data de lançamento:2025-03-28 07:46 tempo visitado:65
To the Editor:cfbet777
Re “Deep Cuts to Medical Research Funds Could Hobble University Budgets” (news article, Feb. 9):
I have watched President Trump issue a flurry of executive orders with growing alarm, but none have hit quite as hard as his reckless decision to slash National Institutes of Health funding. Although a court temporarily blocked the cuts, I fear that the work of N.I.H. and university researchers is still in peril. The American people will suffer if lifesaving research and clinical trials are no longer available.
Our family knows the value of this important work firsthand. My husband was part of multiple clinical trials at the N.I.H. to treat his prostate cancer. The team provided different treatments as needed, and they worked. He is now cancer-free, and we credit the N.I.H. for saving his life.
I worry that in this climate, another family would not be as fortunate. Do members of the Trump administration realize that their actions affect individual lives, not just institutions? More important, do they even care?
Marilyn FenichelHamden, Conn.
To the Editor:
I am not a scientific person. Nor am I highly political. But one thing I know as a breast cancer survivor is that my life and the lives of millions of other cancer survivors have been made possible through biomedical research funded by the National Institutes of Health.
I was able to benefit from decades of N.I.H.-funded research so that my aggressive cancer didn’t stop me from regaining my health and living my best life with my husband and two young children. Putting a freeze on N.I.H. funding could suddenly halt projects that have the potential to cure or alleviate suffering from terrible diseases like cancer, Alzheimer’s or A.L.S.
Biomedical research funded by the N.I.H. is the envy of the world. It has an impact on every one of us who calls the United States home. Research advances don’t know your political party, your religion or wealth. Research has the potential to cross all lines and tie us together as humans, improving life for all of us.
We are having trouble retrieving the article content.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.
The W.H.O. had come under increasing criticism for declaring a global public health emergency for mpox last month without giving a vaccine that prequalification stamp of approval,66br casino or a more provisional form of approval called emergency use authorization. Bavarian Nordic first submitted its safety and effectiveness data on the vaccine, called Jynneos, to the W.H.O. in 2023. The W.H.O. had defended its slow pace of review, saying that it needed to subject the vaccine to careful study because it, and two others that have been used to protect against mpox, were originally designed as smallpox immunizations, and because delivering it in low-resource settings such as Central Africa would involve factors different from those relating to its use in high-income countries.
Worried, Mr. Lee checked the news and saw there had been a shooting in Brooklyn, on the subway line Mr. Delpeche took to his job at Woodhull Hospital. As videos of the scene poured in on social media, Mr. Lee recognized his friend of decades lying on the ground, wounded.
ababkfThank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.
Thank you for your patience while we verify access.
Already a subscriber? Log in.
Want all of The Times? Subscribe.cfbet777
Powered by 66br-66br cassino-66br casino @2013-2022 mapa RSS mapa HTML